After the failed attempts to unleash a civil war in Syria, Syrians mobilized to combat abuses of terrorist gangs West began to sculpt the image “of the Syrian opposition” in a new way.
So far as the “alternative” to the government of Bashar al-Assad discussed sit in Turkey Syrian National Council (SNC, also called “Istanbul council”), funded by Qatar and is under the full control of the French military intelligence – the General Directorate of External Security (DGSE). Most of the members of the Istanbul Council represented “Muslim Brotherhood.”
The main fighting force is still guided by Turkey and equips its Free Syrian Army (SSA), recruited from the Syrian deserters and criminals, insurgents “al-Qaeda”, the Salafis and jihadists. About 80% of the units recognize their spiritual leader Sheikh Adnan Al-Arouri dwelling in Saudi Arabia. The command center is militant in the Turkish city of Adana near a U.S. military base in Incirlik and controlled by the CIA, through which Americans have the “legal” gangs provide financial, information and logistical support.
All the while, the Syrian National Council denied the presence in Syria and the radical Salafi movement, which for him were not very comfortable allies. However, beginning in October, and the SNA, and Western diplomats have openly express concerns about “extremist violence” and “the presence of radical Islamists in the north of Syria, which in the future may be in the hands of the rebels” (although all that’s going on, is an implementation of the plans of Western strategists) (1).
A famous French journalist Thierry Meyssan noticed a strange thing, evidence of transition to the new U.S. tactics. Surprisingly, he said, was the fact that the command of the NATO air base at Incirlik six times jihadists gave instructions for a broad offensive that the Syrian army, effective in the classic battle, successfully resisted. Each time they were surrounded and destroyed. As noted by Meyssan, “the first attempt to include the tactical error, the second – to the tyranny of some illiterate general, and for the sixth time to consider another hypothesis: NATO deliberately sends its fighters to the death” . As for Morocco to Xinjiang jihadists have increasingly manifest their own initiative, Washington decided to cut the number of its become burdensome and dangerous fighters and jihadists began to give orders, puts them under fire from the Syrian army, which destroyed their masses (2).
Edging out the radicals, the Center began its restructuring by recognizing opposition of SNA is unable to act as leader. As Frank put it, the United States State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell, the new structure should be created to ensure the management of the country after the fall of Assad and for “interaction with the world community”. Actually was tasked to create a “Government-in-exile”, which does not have discredited the sophisticated Western society. It does not concealed that Ventrell precisely United States selected individuals and organizations to participate in the Arab League convened the Conference in Doha, capital of Qatar, to form a new structure (3).
He immediately went to two criteria: to be recognized as the militants, it must be a religious figure, but admitted that his West, it must be “reasonable.” But the most valuable thing for the West in him is that he has the knowledge and experience necessary to conduct negotiations, and especially in matters of the gas business.
Presenting it to the public as a political figure, enjoys popular support and the ability to achieve “consensus”, the Western media immediately began to mold the image of the ideal policy. So, Agence France Presse reported that Ahmad al-Khatib Moaz is an independent moderate religious leader, who studied international relations and does not belong to any Islamist movements. In 2012, he was repeatedly arrested for public calls for the overthrow of the Assad regime, he was forbidden to preach in the mosques of Syria, after which he went to Qatar.
However, as indicated by all the same Thierry Meyssan, in fact, everything looks different.Ahmad al-Khatib Moaz never studied international relations. Received a trade geophysicist it for six years (1985-1991) worked in the venture capital firm al-Furat Petroleum Company, relating to the Anglo-Dutch Royal Dutch Shell, with whom he had close ties. Inherited in 1992 from his father Imam prestigious post in the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, he was soon stripped of his powers and allowed to serve in all of Syria. It happened with the father of Bashar al-Assad at a time when Syria supported the international intervention against Iraq, spoke in support of Kuwait. Moaz Ahmad al-Khatib condemned the operation “Desert Storm”, but not for political and religious reasons, also supported bin Laden, who considered sacrilege to any Western presence in the Arab world. Then al-Khatib was engaged in teaching, in particular, at the Netherlands Institute in Damascus, often go abroad, mainly in the Netherlands, the UK and the U.S., before he settled in Qatar. in 2003-2004. he worked in Syria as a lobbyist Royal Dutch Shell, when it sought from the Syrian government oil and gas concessions . In Syria Moaz al-Khatib came back in a hot year 2012 to expand the anti-government propaganda. Being arrested and then pardoned, he left the country and settled in Cairo (4).
As for his religious and political views, that, contrary to the AFP, Al-Khatib, one of the “Muslim Brotherhood” is a supporter of the introduction of Sharia law in Syria and determines Shiites as heretics .
As for F.Ollanda, it always confirms their commitment to the change of power in Syria, nurturing a dream again to turn this country into a French colony. It is no accident, in his speech at the UN, he demanded that the Security Council issue a mandate for the establishment of “zones, freed rebels”, similar to the mandate that was given to France by the League of Nations from 1923 to 1944. Characteristically, that immediately after the establishment of the “National Coalition” French demanded the withdrawal of the European embargo on “defensive weapons” warring against the Assad regime. Thus, France ahead of other Western powers in an attempt to usurp the right to establish and equip “liberated zone” in Syria.
NKORS activity will be purely decorative role Moaz Ahmad Al-Khatib will be reduced solely to the representative function, and all dirty “liberation” work will continue to be performed and the Wahhabi Salafist groups, which also began the centralization and the elimination of “dissent” commanders. Since armed groups entrenched in Aleppo, at their meeting held NKORS condemned the creation and any imposed on them from outside the project, calling for the establishment of the Caliphate, the West can now be removed from any responsibility for their actions.
As always, the hypocrisy of Western politicians unprecedented. Having advanced to the forefront of the “Saloon opposition,” they continue to arm Islamist thugs, clearing the way for the establishment of a new European colonial slavery