“The final victory of the divine over the demonic will be the victory of love. This love is linked to reason. In Milton’s terms, it interacts with reason, both contributing and receiving, as love “hath its seat In reason” and at the same time “refines the thoughts” (VIII, 589-91).” – Roland Mushat Frye. “God, Man, And Satan.” Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey. 1960. Pg. 47.
“Decision’s hour comes. The knot is fastened.
He knows: the call outweighed the will to shun.
Yet his face, like a covered dial,
registers midnight. Even he is bound.” – R. M. Rilke, “The Magician.”
The road to World War III was paved with an epic act of deception by the internationalist U.S. government against Iran and the world. That act was not the false flag September 11 events, but the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and the installment of an militant and totalitarian Islamic regime in Iran headed by Ayatollah Khomeini.
James Perloff, author of, “The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline,” says in his article, “Iran and the Shah: What Really Happened,” that, “at the height of Iran’s prosperity, the Shah suddenly became the target of an ignoble campaign led by U.S. and British foreign policy makers.” Perloff continues:
“Bolstered by slander in the Western press, these forces, along with Soviet-inspired communist insurgents, and mullahs opposing the Shah’s progressiveness, combined to face him with overwhelming opposition. In three years he went from vibrant monarch to exile (on January 16, 1979), and ultimately death, while Iran fell to Ayatollah Khomeini’s terror.
Houchang Nahavandi, one of the Shah’s ministers and closest advisers, reveals in his book The Last Shah of Iran: “We now know that the idea of deposing the Shah was broached continually, from the mid-seventies on, in the National Security Council in Washington, by Henry Kissinger, whom the Shah thought of as a firm friend.”
Kissinger virtually epitomized the American establishment: before acting as Secretary of State under Republicans Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, he had been chief foreign-affairs adviser to Nelson Rockefeller, whom he called “the single most influential person in my life.” Jimmy Carter defeated Ford in the 1976 presidential election, but the switch to a Democratic administration did not change the new foreign policy tilt against the Shah. Every presidential administration since Franklin D. Roosevelt’s has been dominated by members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the most visible manifestation of the establishment that dictates U.S. foreign policy along internationalist lines. The Carter administration was no exception.
The alternation of parties does not change the diplomatic orientation of the United States that much. The process of toppling the Shah had been envisaged and initiated in 1974, under a certain Republican administration…. Numerous, published documents and studies bear witness to the fact, even if it was not until the beginning of the Carter administration that the decision was made to take concerted action by evoking problems related to human rights.
The Shah’s destruction required assembling a team of diplomatic “hit men.” Du Berrier commented:
When the situation was deemed ripe, U.S. Ambassador William Sullivan — the man reputed to have toppled the pro-American government of General Phoumi Nosavan in Laos — was sent to urge the Shah to get out. In December Mr. George Ball, an instant “authority on Iran,” was sent as a follow-up with the same message.
Sullivan (CFR), a career diplomat with no Middle East experience, became our ambassador to Iran in 1977. The Shah recalled:
Whenever I met Sullivan and asked him to confirm these official statements [of American support], he promised he would. But a day or two later he would return, gravely shake his head, and say that he had received “no instructions” and therefore could not comment…. His answer was always the same: I have received no instructions…. This rote answer had been given me since early September  and I would continue to hear it until the day I left the country.
The other key player du Berrier named, George Ball, was a quintessential establishment man: CFR member, Bilderberger, and banker with Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb. The Shah commented: “What was I to make, for example, of the Administration’s sudden decision to call former Under Secretary of State George Ball to the White House as an advisor on Iran? I knew that Ball was no friend.”
The official narrative of Iran’s Islamic Revolution paints the U.S. administration as the stalwart ally of the Shah and a foe of the fundamentalist clerics. But the facts, as recounted by Perloff and others, prove otherwise. The reverse is true. America and the West hated the Shah, and favoured the Ayatollah, whose regime it now decries as a rogue state and the biggest source of instability in the Middle East.
One of the reasons the U.S.-British financial oligarchy removed the Shah from power was because he was against the opium trade. Other reasons are listed in this article.
II. The U.S. Government’s War Against Iran Began When The Shah Was On The Throne
The words “sinister” “hateful” and “evil” best explain U.S. and British policy towards Iran. First they overthrew Iran’s democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953, then they overthrew the Shah in 1979, and now they’re looking to overthrow the Ayatollahs in 2012.
Whereas the U.S. government is pursuing a policy of full-blown war against the Ayatollahs, it practiced a policy of silent psychological warfare, political betrayal, and secret sabotage against the Shah. The globalist oligarchy in Washington and London outmaneuvered the Shah politically, bombarded the Iranian nation with anti-Shah and pro-Khomeini propaganda, and later imposed an eight-year war upon Iran via Saddam’s Iraq in which 500,000 Iranian fighters died needlessly. The war allowed Ayatollah Khomeini to consolidate his power, militarize Iranian society, and Islamize Iran’s political, cultural, and educational institutions.
The deception by America and England was possible because both governments fully embrace the powers of deception, trickery, and dishonesty. As Satan’s minions, they cornered Iran, driving it into ruin, chaos, terror, desolation, slavery, and war. But the grand deceiver is not to blame for everything. The Iranian people made a catastrophic mistake by throwing out the lion and running into the arms of the Islamic fox, while under the delusion that freedom would be gained by their act of disobedience towards their King.
Was there a chance for Iran to defeat Khomeini’s two-faced gang and the sinister Anglo-American plot? Could it overcome the powers of hell? Perloff explains how the Iranian military couldn’t act against Khomeini’s foreign-sponsored insurrection against the Shah because its close partnership to the U.S. military made it vulnerable to Washington’s extreme demands. He writes:
Iran’s last hope: its well-trained military could still restore order. The Carter administration realized this. Du Berrier noted: “Air Force General Robert Huyser, deputy commander of U.S. forces in Europe, was sent to pressure Iran’s generals into giving in without a fight.” “Huyser directly threatened the military with a break in diplomatic relations and a cutoff of arms if they moved to support their monarch.”
“It was therefore necessary,” the Shah wrote, “to neutralize the Iranian army. It was clearly for this reason that General Huyser had come to Teheran.”
Huyser only paid the Shah a cursory visit, but had three meetings with Iran’s revolutionary leaders — one lasting 10 hours. Huyser, of course, had no authority to interfere with a foreign nation’s sovereign affairs.
Prior to execution later by Khomeini, General Amir Hossein Rabbi, commander-in-chief of the Iranian Air Force, stated: “General Huyser threw the Shah out of the country like a dead mouse.”
U.S. officials pressed the Shah to leave Iran. He reflected:
You cannot imagine the pressure the Americans were putting on me, and in the end it became an order…. How could I stay when the Americans had sent a general, Huyser, to force me out? How could I stand alone against Henry Precht [the State Department Director for Iran] and the entire State Department?
He finally accepted exile, clinging to the belief that America was still Iran’s ally, and that leaving would avert greater bloodshed. These hopes proved illusions.
Some say that the Shah’s error was that he did not stand his ground and put up a fight. But how can a King go to war against sections of his own country, while a global empire is breathing down his neck? It would be madness and folly. The tragedy is that the Shah avoided blood, while Ayatollah Khomeini and his powerful Western backers desired it like nothing else. Khomeini infamously stated to his brainwashed slaves: “Destroy, destroy, destroy. There cannot be enough destruction.”
III. The Creation of An Islamic Caliphate By The Luciferian Globalist Terrorists And Shadowy Bilderbergers
The Western-sponsored Arab Spring in countries like Egypt, Libya, and Syria is in a lot of ways a continuation of the Islamic spring in Iran that was engineered by the artful political manipulators of the Anglo-American empire, who crave a clash of civilizations between the Islamic world and the Western world.
As the historian F. William Engdahl said in November 2011 on Russia Today, “The events, the so-called Arab Spring, have been planned years back. And the instigators of those so-called spontaneous protests, these twitter revolts in Cairo, and Tunisia, and so forth, over the last months, have all been pre-organized assiduously. Some of the leaders of the protests have been trained in Belgrade in Serbia by Otpor activists financed by the State Department. This thing has State Department and U.S. intelligence all over it.”
As events unfold in the Middle East, we will witness the rise of an Islamic Caliphate stretching from Libya to Iran to Pakistan. The CIA and Western intelligence agencies have already made Tripoli an Islamist stronghold and Cairo and Damascus are tilting towards the same direction.
Extremist Islamic leaders across the region fool their constituencies by claiming to be against Western domination, but they never publicize the fact that the same Western powers they’re railing against put them on the throne. Which begs the question: why deceive people into war? The answer stares us in the face: to create a massive global crisis out of which an authoritarian global government will emerge as a shining city on the rubble of time.
IV. The Planned Grand Destruction of The World
The plot to start World War III by the evil manipulators in Washington, London, Tel Aviv, and Tehran cannot be stopped if it is not exposed. The roots of the 9/11 mythology must be pulled out, as well as the deception that the Islamic Republic of Iran grew out of a spontaneous revolution against the US-backed dictatorship of the Shah.
The facts clearly prove that the U.S. government abandoned the Shah in the mid 1970s because he was taking Iran on an independent, progressive, and prosperous path. They hated that he was a modernizer, liberalizer, and nationalist, so they stabbed him in the back and replaced him with a transnationalist and anti-development Islamist radical whose policies of terror and destruction were supported by the U.S. and British governments.
All the evidence shows that the Luciferian globalist terrorists in Washington and elsewhere are initiating a third world war to radically shape the political fate of the world, drastically reduce the global population, and transform the psychic and spiritual life of humanity.
Their secret plan is to reduce the West and the Middle East to ashes by a global war and a global economic depression, and then roll out a one world government as a solution to both invented crises. America, Israel, Iran, and every other nation involved in World War III are all being set up to be sacrificed.
The grand acts of deception — from the U.S.-backed Iranian Islamic Revolution to the false flag 9/11 events and the recent Arab Spring movements — all point to a time of grand destruction that is near at hand.